MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3128374225 · doi:10.1115/etce2001-17010

Experiments on Annular Liquid Jet Breakup

2001· article· en· W3128374225 on OpenAlexaff
Xianguo Li, Jihua Shen

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics and Heat Transfer
Canadian institutionsWestern UniversityUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBreakupMechanicsBubbleJet (fluid)InstabilityBreak-UpLiquid bubbleWeber numberOpticsMaterials sciencePhysicsTurbulenceReynolds number

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Experimental investigations have been carried out for the breakup process of an annular water jet exposed to an inner air stream by videographic and photographic techniques. Three flow regimes for the jet breakup process have been identified, i.e., bubble formation, annular jet formation and atomization. Within the bubble formation regime, the jet breakup characteristics measured from the photographs taken under various liquid and gas velocities indicate that nearly uniform bubbles are observed for various air-to-water velocity ratios; both the jet breakup length and the wavelength for bubble formation decrease as the air-to-water velocity ratio is increased. The measurements are compared with the predictions by the linear instability analysis, and fair agreement is obtained.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.447
Threshold uncertainty score0.754

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicFluid Dynamics and Heat TransferFrench-language works237,207