MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3128400016 · doi:10.1155/2021/6663022

Fitting Method of Optimal Energy-Running Time Curve Based on Train Operation Data of an Urban Rail Section

2021· article· en· W3128400016 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Lianbo Deng, Hongda Mei, Wenliang Zhou, E Jing

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Advanced Transportation · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRailway Systems and Energy Efficiency
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsCurve fittingEnergy consumptionOutlierEnergy (signal processing)SmoothnessData pointAlgorithmData setComputer scienceSimulationMathematical optimizationEngineeringMathematicsStatisticsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Due to the complexity of the operation control of urban rail transit and diversity requirements for section running time standards, based on actual train operation data, this paper proposes a curve fitting method to find the interrelation between running time and energy consumption. According to features of the energy consumption-running time curve, the discriminant criterion of outliers is constructed to select the candidate fitting data set from the original data set. To fit the energy consumption-running time curve from two-dimensional scatter points, we propose a B-spline curve fitting method based on a genetic algorithm and the fitting method is proven to have high fitting accuracy and convergence speed. Furthermore, we propose an optimization method for the fitting curve based on dynamic adjustment of the fitting data set which is selected from the candidate fitting data set to obtain the optimal energy-running time curve. The validation of Guangzhou Metro's actual operation data shows that the energy-running time curve fitted and optimized by our method has lower energy and better continuity and smoothness and could be used for evaluation of train drivers’ performance and energy consumption of train operation diagram.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.420
Threshold uncertainty score0.466

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Advanced TransportationSame topicRailway Systems and Energy EfficiencyFrench-language works237,207