An evaluation of temperature stability and resistance in neonatal ventilator circuits
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Gas conditioning minimizes complications associated with invasive ventilation of neonates. Poorly conditioned gas contributes to humidity deficit, facilitates condensate pools, and contributes to safety events. The specific aim was to objectively quantify the temperature drop across the unheated portion of a neonatal circuit and the impact condensation has to resistance to flow in the ventilator circuit. Methods: Ventilator circuits and filters were obtained, assembled according to manufacturer recommendations, and operational verification procedures were performed prior to data collection. A neonatal test lung was connected to each Servo-I ventilator with the following settings: pressure control IMV mode; inspiratory pressure: 14 cm H 2 O to achieve an exhaled tidal volume of 6.0 mL; PEEP: 5 cm H 2 O; pressure support: 5 cm H 2 O, F I O 2: 0.21; set frequency 40/min; and inspiratory time: 0.4 s. The Fisher and Paykel MR850 and ChonchaTherm Neptune heaters were set at a temperature of 40C. To evaluate both systems under similar conditions, the ChonchaTherm Neptune heater humidity control was set to midline. Heaters were turned on simultaneously and given 1 h to equilibrate. Readings for room temperature, airway temperature at the patient connection, airway resistance, exhaled tidal volume, and direct observation of circuit condensation and (or) pooling were recorded hourly for a 48-h period. Summary statistics were calculated for the variables of interest. Results: Mean (SD) air temperature was 26.3C (1.4) for the Fisher & Paykel MR850 system and 26.2C (1.5), for the ChonchaTherm Neptune system. Mean (SD) airway resistance was 229.3 cm H 2 O/L/s (81.0) for the Fisher & Paykel system and 196.2 cm H 2 O/L/s (39.4) for the ChonchaTherm Neptune system. Mean (SD) tidal volume for the Fisher & Paykel MR850 system was 6.5 mL (0.4), and for the ChonchaTherm Neptune system was 7.2 mL (0.6).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".