Biomechanical optimization of the far cortical locking technique for early healing of distal femur fractures
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This finite element study optimized far cortical locking (FCL) technology for early callus formation in distal femur fracture fixation with a 9-hole plate using FCL screws proximal to, and standard locking screws distal to, the fracture. Analyses were done for 120 possible FCL screw configurations by varying FCL screw distribution and number. A hip joint force of 700 N (i.e. 100% x body weight) was used, which corresponds to a typical 140 N “toe-touch” foot-to-ground force (i.e. 20% x body weight) suggested to patients immediately after surgery. Increased FCL screw distribution (i.e. shorter plate working length) caused a decrease at the medial side and an increase at the lateral side of the axial interfragmentary motion (AIM), mildly affected shaft and condylar cortex Von Mises max stress (σMAX), increased plate σMAX, and decreased shaft FCL screw and condylar locking screw σMAX. Increased FCL screw number decreased AIM and σMAX on the shaft cortex, condylar cortex, plate, and FCL screws, but not condylar screws. The optimal FCL screw configuration had 3 FCL screws in plate holes #1, 5, and 6 (proximal to distal) for optimal AIM of 0.2 - 1 mm and reduce shear fracture motion, thereby encouraging early callus formation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".