Uncooperative Spacecraft Pose Estimation Using Monocular Monochromatic Images
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Imaging cameras are cost-effective sensors for spacecraft navigation. Image-driven techniques to extract the target spacecraft from its background are efficient and do not require pretraining. In this paper, we introduce several image-driven foreground extraction methods, including combining the difference of Gaussian-based scene detection and graph manifold ranking-based foreground saliency generation. We successfully apply our foreground extraction method on infrared images from the STS-135 flight mission captured by the space shuttle’s Triangulation and LIDAR Automated Rendezvous and Docking System (TriDAR) thermal camera. Our saliency approach demonstrates state-of-the-art performance and provides an order of magnitude reduction in processing speed from the traditional methods. Furthermore, we develop a new uncooperative spacecraft pose estimation method by combining our foreground extraction technique with the level-set region-based pose estimation with novel initialization and gradient descent enhancements. Our method is validated using synthetically generated Envisat, Radarsat model, and International Space Station motion sequences. The proposed process is also validated with real rendezvous flight images of the International Space Station.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".