MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3128557522 · doi:10.2749/vancouver.2017.0421

Rosedale Overhead: Functional Upgrades, Structural Rehabilitation and Seismic Retrofit

2017· article· en· W3128557522 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueReport · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
Canadian institutionsKlohn Crippen Berger (Canada)Hatch (Canada)WSP (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGirderStructural engineeringDeckBridge (graph theory)Span (engineering)EngineeringOverhead (engineering)Electrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<p>The Rosedale Overhead is a 77m long two-lane crossing of BC’s Highway 9 over a busy railway track. Built in 1956, the current improvements include widening, new barriers, seismic retrofit and structural rehabilitation, including full concrete deck replacement. The initial design considered retaining and over-coating the existing girders. However, the final design was the outright replacement of the existing girders, with the new girders configured as continuous spans. This concept was preferred because of the lower costs, a savings partly attributed to the reduced number of girder lines from eight to five and bearings by more than half. A reliable seismic load path was established by infilling the bents either side of the rail tracks and locking the bridge ends with new semi-integral abutments. All other bents were left un-retrofitted with low-friction PTFE bearings to reduce lateral bent demands and avoid foundationupgrades.</p>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.804
Threshold uncertainty score0.437

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it