MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Demand Side Management using Model-Free Fuzzy Controller in a Direct Load Control Program

2020· article· en· W3128558301 on OpenAlexaff
Pegah Yazdkhasti, Chris Diduch

Bibliographic record

Venue2020 IEEE Electric Power and Energy Conference (EPEC) · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSmart Grid Energy Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
FundersSiemens
KeywordsThermostatController (irrigation)Computer scienceControl theory (sociology)Electric power systemDemand responseLoad managementControl engineeringOperator (biology)Load profileFuzzy logicGridLoad following power plantPower (physics)Base load power plantControl (management)EngineeringElectricity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Integrating renewable resources such as wind and solar into the electric power systems introduces new challenges to the grid due to fast fluctuations which reduces the reliability of the system. Demand side management (DSM) is one method to cope with the uncertainty and variability of the generation. Direct load control of thermostatically controlled appliances can play a significant role for this purpose; however, the system operator requires a reliable estimation about the magnitude of the load and how much it can be shifted, in order to produce attainable desired aggregated load. The focus of this paper is on designing a model-free controller to follow the system operator's dispatch instructions. The main advantage of such controller is to eliminate the requirement for training or identifying the controllable loads' parameters; thus, it can be used as a plug & play component. The other advantage is that this system can dynamically cope with system changes. In this research, the controller changes the thermostat set points of the individual loads in a systematically manner so that the aggregated power consumptions of the loads would follow the desired aggregated load. To evaluate the performance of the proposed controller, a numerical simulator was developed, and the controller was applied over the simulation engine to follow arbitrary desired power profiles. It was observed that the system can follow the dispatch command in less than 10 minutes with a negligible steady state error (less than 5%).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.828
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2020 IEEE Electric Power and Energy Conference (EPEC)Same topicSmart Grid Energy ManagementFrench-language works237,207