Les Interrelations humaines: Échos d’une étude de sociologie urbaine de Nathalie Lalanne avec les valeurs transhumanistes d’Hédi Bouraoui
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Une comparaison entre l’etude de terrain de la sociologue Nathalie Lalanne sur le commerce local et les ecrits d’Hedi Bouraoui permet de mettre au jour des convergences d’idees entre les deux auteurs, l’une issue de l’Universite de Toulouse le Mirail (1996), l’autre de la meme universite mais bien avant le Mirail (1957), autour de la question des interrelations humaines. Ce qui apparait a travers l’œuvre de l’ecrivain tuniso-franco-canadien, et qui reapparait clairement sous la plume de la sociologue francaise, est l’incontestable impulsion donnee par l’apport pluridisciplinaire d’une demarche. Resterait peut-etre a transformer, mais sans grands changements, son travail de recherche minutieux, d’une qualite exceptionnelle, en un essai afin de le mettre a disposition d’un public autant specialiste que generaliste. Mais il pourrait rester tel quel : cela ne changerait rien a sa haute valeur et tenue.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.028 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".