MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3128644658 · doi:10.1088/2515-7647/abe3d9

Photonic pattern reconstruction enabled by on-chip online learning and inference

2021· article· en· W3128644658 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physics Photonics · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNeural Networks and Reservoir Computing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeuromorphic engineeringPhotonicsSilicon photonicsComputer scienceArtificial neural networkExploitInferenceBandwidth (computing)Hopfield networkChipElectronic engineeringLatency (audio)Computer architectureArtificial intelligenceTelecommunicationsEngineeringOptoelectronicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Recent investigations in neuromorphic photonics exploit optical device physics for neuron models, and optical interconnects for distributed, parallel, and analog processing. Integrated solutions enabled by silicon photonics enable high-bandwidth, low-latency and low switching energy, making it a promising candidate for special-purpose artificial intelligence hardware accelerators. Here, we experimentally demonstrate a silicon photonic chip that can perform training and testing of a Hopfield network, i.e. recurrent neural network, via vector dot products. We demonstrate that after online training, our trained Hopfield network can successfully reconstruct corrupted input patterns.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.917
Threshold uncertainty score0.497

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it