RIBEIRÃO PRETO EN LA HISTORIA DE LA ENFERMERÍA: RIBEIRÃO PRETO IN THE HISTORY OF NURSING
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El autor realiza una reflexion sobre la trascendencia que ha supuesto la recien firmada ‘Carta de Ribeirao Preto’ que auna a numerosas asociaciones de Historia de la Enfermeria de Estados Unidos de Norteamerica, Canada, Brasil, Portugal y Espana para la reivindicacion de una ‘justa’ carga docente en los programas universitarios deEnfermeria. Palabras claves: Carta de Ribeirao Preto; Historia de la Enfermeria; Educacion;Enfermeria. AbstractThe author reflects on the significance of the recently signed 'Letter from Ribeirao Preto', which brings together numerous associations of the History of Nursing in the United States of America, Canada, Brazil, Portugal and Spain for the demand for a 'fair 'teaching load in university nursing programs.Key words: Letter from Ribeirao Preto; History of nursing; Education; Nursing.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".