Proof of Concept for a Deep Learning Algorithm for Identification and Quantification of Key Microscopic Features in the Murine Model of DSS-Induced Colitis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a complex disease which leads to life-threatening complications and decreased quality of life. The dextran sulfate sodium (DSS) colitis model in mice is known for rapid screening of candidate compounds. Efficacy assessment in this model relies partly on microscopic semiquantitative scoring, which is time-consuming and subjective. We hypothesized that deep learning artificial intelligence (AI) could be used to identify acute inflammation in H&E-stained sections in a consistent and quantitative manner. Training sets were established using ×20 whole slide images of the entire colon. Supervised training of a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) was performed using a commercial AI platform to detect the entire colon tissue, the muscle and mucosa layers, and 2 categories within the mucosa (normal and acute inflammation E1). The training sets included slides of naive, vehicle-DSS and cyclosporine A-DSS mice. The trained CNN was able to segment, with a high level of concordance, the different tissue compartments in the 3 groups of mice. The segmented areas were used to determine the ratio of E1-affected mucosa to total mucosa. This proof-of-concept work shows promise to increase efficiency and decrease variability of microscopic scoring of DSS colitis when screening candidate compounds for IBD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".