MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3128726075 · doi:10.1080/15376494.2021.1877377

Static and dynamic analysis of homogeneous Micropolar-Cosserat panels

2021· article· en· W3128726075 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMechanics of Advanced Materials and Structures · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicNonlocal and gradient elasticity in micro/nano structures
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCurvatureFinite element methodMathematicsBernoulli's principleClassical mechanicsEquations of motionStress (linguistics)Mathematical analysisMechanicsStructural engineeringPhysicsGeometryEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper communicates an analytical study on computing the natural frequencies and in-plane deflections caused by static forces in the panel walls using Euler-Bernoulli, Timoshenko, Timoshenko and Goodier, Couple-stress, and Micropolar-Cosserat theory. The study highlights the formulation of the transfer matrix via the state-space method in the spatial domain; from coupled governing equations of motion that arises from the Micropolar-Cosserat theory. This theory captures the novel curvature of edges and moments of the panels at energy density level due to its unique feature of asymmetric shear stresses; that emphasizes the loss of ellipticity of governing equations. The analytical solution of the Micropolar-Cosserat theory yield appropriate results compared to plane-stress simulation of the panels using finite element analysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score0.754

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it