Wood Removals from Lakes May Not Necessarily Elicit Fish Population Responses
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Coarse woody habitat (CWH) in aquatic ecosystems provides structural complexity and a surface for food production for fish. Depending on abundance and complexity of CWH, it is usually associated with influencing predator–prey dynamics, fostering greater localized fish abundance, increasing fish growth, and contributing to fish production, but some conflicting evidence exists about its importance as fish habitat. Our experiment was designed to test for direct linkages between whole-lake CWH availability and fish community abundance, biomass, and production. We removed ~50% of CWH from three lakes while concurrently sampling them and two other unaffected lakes as controls in a before-after–control-impact (BACI) design. Due to the loss of quality foraging habitat, structure, and cover for small fish, we hypothesized that the CWH removal would cause a measurable decline in fish abundance, biomass, and/or production. Despite CWH being a preferred habitat type for fish, our hypothesis was not supported because observed changes in measured fish community metrics could not be attributed to the CWH removal. The inability to directly link the wood removal to changes in the fish metrics we examined may have been due to a number of factors including the composition of the fish community, the high availability of alternate habitat structure (rocks, macrophytes), large quantities of wood remaining in the lakes, the relative lack of littoral habitat use by piscivores, or low statistical power (small sample size, high variance). However, we still urge resource managers to be cautious when considering authorizing removal of CWH from lakes because it does provide temporally stable year-round structure and high-quality foraging habitat with unique microbial, fungal, and invertebrate communities. Coarse woody habitat was a preferred habitat for fish and may have a greater relative importance in lakes with minimal alternative cover for fishes or in lakes containing different fish assemblages.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".