MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3128742456

Should Excise Tax be Collected on Mobile Services?: Experience in Thailand

2018· preprint· en· W3128742456 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Thamrongsak Svetalekth

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicTaxation and Compliance Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExciseBusinessTax revenueGovernment (linguistics)CommissionRevenueTariffPopulationQuarter (Canadian coin)Goods and servicesAdvertisingFinancePublic economicsEconomicsInternational tradeGeographyEconomyMedicineEnvironmental health
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nowadays, it cannot oppose that mobilephone is necessary in daily life, particularly, smartphone. However, some people have more than one mobilephone that may be extravagant. From the telecommunication market report of the Office of the National Broadcasting and Telecommunications Commission in the third quarter of 2017, it was found that there are 119.50 million mobilephone numbers in Thailand or 171% of Thai population. In other words, the average of mobilephone per person is 1.71. Thus, if government realises that mobile services are too much consumed and luxurious, government should reconsider to levy excise tax on mobile services as excise tax collection in 2003- 2008. This article shows tax base, taxpayers and experiences from overseas on mobile tax, revenue collection, advantages, disadvantages and economic impacts on tax on mobile services.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.066

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.102
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicTaxation and Compliance StudiesFrench-language works237,207