MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Study of energy response and resolution of the ATLAS Tile Calorimeter to hadrons of energies from 16 to 30 GeV

2021· article· en· W3128781402 on OpenAlexaff
Jalal Abdallah, S. Angelidakis, G. Arabidze, N. Atanov, J. Bernhard, R. Bonnefoy, J. D. Bossio Sola, Ryan Bouabid, F. Carrió Argos, T. Davídek, M. Dubovsky, L. Fiorini, Francisco Brandan Garcia Aparisi, A. Gerbershagen, Hazal Goksu, H. K. Hadavand, Siarhei Harkusha, D. R. Hlaluku, Michael Hibbard, Kevin Hildebrand, A. Hrynevich, A. Kamenshchikov, S. Kazakos, Tomáš Kello, Ilya Korolkov, Y. Kulchitsky, Hadar Lazar, Nthabiseng Lekalakala, J. D. Little, R. Madar, S. Manen, Thabo Masuku, Irakli Minashvili, T. Mkrtchyan, M. Mlynarikova, Seyedali Moayedi, S. Němeček, Lawrence Nodulman, R. Oganezov, Mats Joakim Robert Olsson, M. J. Oreglia, P. Pani, Alexander Paramonov, Ruth Pöttgen, Tres Reid, S. Rodriguez Bosca, A. Rodriguez Perez, Rachel Christine Rosten, P. Saha, C. Santoni, L Sargsyan, N. A. Shalanda, Alexander Solodkov, Oleg Solovyanov, P. Starovoitov, Evgeny Starchenko, P. Tas, Viacheslav Tereshchenko, Michaël Ughetto, Lea Uhliarová, Giulio Usai, Eduardo Valdes Santurio, Guido Volpi, T. Zakareishvili, Pedro Zuccarello

Bibliographic record

VenueThe European Physical Journal C · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLarge Hadron ColliderAtlas (anatomy)PhysicsNuclear physicsCalorimeter (particle physics)Proton SynchrotronATLAS experimentAtlas detectorHadronDetectorPionProtonParticle physicsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Three spare modules of the ATLAS Tile Calorimeter were exposed to test beams from the Super Proton Synchrotron accelerator at CERN in 2017. The detector’s measurements of the energy response and resolution to positive pions and kaons, and protons with energies ranging from 16 to 30 GeV are reported. The results have uncertainties of a few percent. They were compared to the predictions of the Geant4-based simulation program used in ATLAS to estimate the response of the detector to proton-proton events at the Large Hadron Collider. The determinations obtained using experimental and simulated data agree within the uncertainties.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe European Physical Journal CSame topicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studiesFrench-language works237,207