Labor Migration in a Globalized World: The Human Journey's Challenges for International Law and Policy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this Article, Professor Julien Chaisse and Mr. Lloyd Meng cover the most recent developments in the field of international economic migration, including the latest WTO Ministerial Conference of December 2015 and the conclusion of the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) in November 2015. The authors examine how international economic migration has developed over past years by critical analysis of frameworks found in the Preferential Trade Agreements of the United States, Canada, and Chile, with particular attention to market access and the standard of treatment afforded to temporary migrants. Recent European developments in the area of focused bilateral migration agreements are also discussed in the context of international economic migration. The authors conclude by analyzing the effect of the TPP, the practices it imposed, and the similarities and differences between those practices and the recent practices that have developed through the PTAs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.013 | 0.039 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.015 | 0.011 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.009 |
| Research integrity | 0.007 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".