MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3128812646 · doi:10.18023/ijece.2020.26.2.004

혼전임신에 따른 아버지 됨의 경험

2020· article· ko· W3128812646 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Hyo-Kook Bang, Ga-Hye Min

Bibliographic record

VenueEarly childhood education · 2020
Typearticle
Languageko
FieldEngineering
TopicMilitary Technology and Strategies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

본 연구는 혼전임신으로 인해 아버지가 된 남성의 경험을 통해 준비되지 않은 아버지 역할에서 느끼는 심리·정서적 변화와 성장 과정을 탐구하였다. 수집된 자료는 상황적 맥락(혼전임신, 출산 준비, 출산, 자녀 양육)에 따라 아버지의 외적, 내적 변화를 이해하고 준비되지 않은 아버지로서 겪게 되는 경험의 본질적 의미를 이해하기위해 사례연구 방법으로 분석하였다. 그 결과, ‘임신으로 인해 느낀 복합적인 감정’, ‘준비되지 않은 아버지로서의 맞섬’, ‘죄책감으로 맞이한 아이’, ‘양면의 동전 같은 아버지 됨’ 4개의 대주제가 도출되었으며, 이러한 본 연구의 결과는 혼전임신 가정을 위한 제도적 지원과 아버지 교육프로그램 개발에도 의미 있는 시사점을 제공할 수 있을 것이라 기대된다.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.081

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.020
Scholarly communication0.0100.009
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0240.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEarly childhood educationSame topicMilitary Technology and StrategiesFrench-language works237,207