Characterization of a resonant capacitively coupled wireless power transfer system for communication purposes at 6 MHz
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract This work characterizes a wireless power transmission (WPT) system operating at the 6 MHz frequency band for wireless information transfer purposes. To perform the characterization, the channel is modelled using its 2‐port network scattering parameters. Then, a long string of symbols encoded with on–off keying and modified Miller encoding is passed through the channel model at various data rates. The original data is recovered from the channel output signal using a software‐defined receiver. Bit error rate curves and eye diagrams are created for each encoding scheme and data rate. To verify the simulated results, the aforementioned data strings are transferred through the actual WPT system and output signals are post‐processed in the digital domain with the same software‐defined receiver. For comparison purposes, the performance of the WPT channel is compared to that of a conventional wireless communication channel with a flat additive white Gaussian noise model. The simulation and measurement results demonstrate that the provided WPT system can be used for data transfer with an acceptable error rate.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it