Sensitivity of Compact Polarimetric SAR Parameters to Modeled Lake Ice Growth
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Synthetic aperture radar (SAR) is a valuable tool for lake ice monitoring. The recently proposed SAR configuration for Earth observation called compact polarimetric (CP) SAR could be a good compromised choice between conventional (single or dual) and fully polarimetric (FP) SAR for operational ice applications, including lake ice. Given its enhanced radar target information compared with conventional SAR systems over wider swath coverage compared with FP SAR, CP systems could play important role in the new generation of Earth observation systems. Herein, we study the evolution of CP SAR parameters from simulated CP SAR data in relation to early ice growth. Focus of the study is on four lakes located in Cornwallis Island, Canadian Central Arctic. We adopt parameters extracted from dual circular polarimetric and right circular transmit, linear (horizontal and vertical) receive configurations. In this study, we consider the ice thickness calculated from an established empirical model. Meteorological and ice climatological data were used to support the analysis. Results demonstrated a potential connection between a number of CP parameters and lake ice growth. Furthermore, we were able to highlight the relationship between the density of air bubbles in ice layer and the intensity of volume scattering mechanism, leading to the identification of lakes with increased gas production activities. Thus, differences between lakes in terms of density of air bubbles were detected and statistically evaluated.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".