MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3128878406 · doi:10.1002/joa3.12514

Postpacing interval is shorter than tachycardia cycle length—What's the mechanism?

2021· article· en· W3128878406 on OpenAlexaff
Anand Manickavasagam, K. Nair, Sirish Chandra Srinath Patloori, David Chase, John Roshan

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Arrhythmia · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
Canadian institutionsToronto General HospitalUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAtrial flutterCardiologyInternal medicineCoronary sinusTachycardiaAblationSinus rhythmAmiodaroneElectrophysiology studyCatheter ablationAtrial fibrillation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 33-year-old male who underwent surgery for Tetralogy of Fallot presented with atrial flutter. Electrophysiology study revealed concealed entrainment along the mid lateral right atrium with postpacing interval shorter than the tachycardia cycle length. Ablation at this site terminated the tachycardia. The presence of shorter PPI than TCL was due to a large virtual electrode leading to downstream capture of far field tissue. This case demonstrates that sites showing PPI shorter than TCL are in a slow conducting narrow critical isthmus and hence constitute good ablation targets. A 33-year-old gentleman who underwent surgery for Tetralogy of Fallot at 5 years of age presented with recurrent episodes of palpitations. Electrocardiogram [ECG] taken during the tachycardia showed atypical atrial flutter with right bundle branch aberrancy. His baseline ECG showed sinus rhythm with the same aberrancy. Therapy with a combination of beta-blockers and amiodarone was ineffective. After stopping amiodarone for 4 weeks, he was taken up for a cardiac electrophysiological study (EPS) with the intent to proceed with 3-D mapping guided Radiofrequency ablation using an Abbott Ensite NAVX Navigation system. Three diagnostic Electrophysiology (EP) catheters were placed for EPS – (a) a quadripolar catheter (2-5-2 spacing) at the right ventricular (RV) apex, (b) a decapolar catheter (2-5-2 spacing) in the coronary sinus (CS), and (c) a duo-decapolar catheter (2-10-2 spacing)—around the tricuspid annulus (TA) with its tip near the os (Os refers to the mouth or orifice of a given structure) of CS and the proximal poles at the atrial septum. On atrial burst pacing, atrial flutter identical to the clinical tachycardia (positive flutter waves in leads II, III, aVF and equiphasic in V1 with an isoelectric interval between flutter waves) was easily inducible. The tachycardia cycle length was 275 ms. The activation pattern in the duo-decapolar showed the earliest signal in the mid poles 9-10 [which was along the mid lateral right atrium (LRA)]. Entrainment mapping revealed manifest fusion on pacing from the proximal and distal CS at 5 milliamperes [mA]. Pacing from the mid Duo-decapolar electrodes 9-10 failed to capture at the same output. Pacing from here at 12 mA revealed concealed fusion with difference between postpacing interval [PPI] and tachycardia cycle length [TCL] (dPPI) of—11 ms as depicted in Figure 1. What is the mechanism for PPI shorter than the TCL at this site? Based on the entrainment mapping, we could surmise that the distal and the proximal CS electrodes were away from the tachycardia reentrant circuit, while the duo-decapolar 9-10 electrodes were either close to the circuit or near the exit zone of the critical isthmus region. At this point, a high-density activation map of the right atrium was created using AdvisorTM HD Grid Mapping Catheter (Abbott Laboratories). At the site of interest (SOI)—the mid lateral right atrium, there were highly fragmented signals which spanned 66% of the tachycardia cycle length (Figure 2). These areas of slow conduction had voltages as low as 0.2 to 0.3 mV. Tachycardia was ‘bump’—terminated while mapping this probable isthmus. The width of this critical isthmus was 4mm and the conduction velocity here was 0.12 m/s. The common reasons for a negative dPPI are pitfalls related to performing and interpreting the entrainment manoeuver. Causes for a pseudoshort PPI are intermittent capture, spontaneous TCL variability, transient acceleration of the tachycardia, and incorrect annotation of the return cycle. The latter can result from erroneously measuring the PPI to a large far field signal as can occur while mapping close to intracardiac structures like the papillary muscle. The inability to distinguish between a near and far field electrogram can also happen when the substrate is markedly diseased with low amplitude fractionated signals. In our case, all these pseudoshort PPI causes were first excluded. We were then left with the possibility of downstream capture, because of high-output pacing resulting in a large virtual electrode (Figure 3 left-side panels A, B, C), being the mechanism behind the negative dPPI at that site. Additional contributing factors could have been the chance orientation of the pacing electrodes that confronted a zone of anisotropy (involving the narrow critical isthmus) which was overcome by high-output pacing. The capture of adjoining transitioning tissue with better conduction velocity further downstream in the circuit by the leading edge of the depolarization wave front, aids in foreshortening of the return cycle duration. With a smaller pacing virtual electrode, or lower pacing output during the tachycardia, these factors would have prolonged the overall conduction velocity within the circuit and the PPI duration. Further, the size of the virtual electrode showing the truncation of the PPI-TCL duration may not have been sufficient to result in manifest fusion with the given catheter position and its resolution characteristics. The sites showing shorter PPI than TCL were commonly located in the region of narrow critical isthmus whose width is <25 mm and exhibit a slow conduction velocity 0.49 + 0.43 m/s and low voltages 0.48 ± 0.79 mV. Since, the SOI (mid lateral right atrium) was in such an area, pacing from here yielded a negative dPPI. It can be deduced that the tachycardia was because of localized reentry in the region of mid lateral right atrium as we demonstrated; (a) reentry with atrial overdrive pacing, (b) simultaneous recording of fragmented signals spanning 66% of the TCL using the HD grid catheter and (c) the entire circuit was confined to the lateral RA wall (Figure 4). Radiofrequency energy application here was immediately successful in terminating the tachycardia. Ablation was carried out around this isthmus to eliminate all fragmented potentials. Post ablation there was no tachycardia inducible despite aggressive atrial burst and programmed pacing in the presence of isoprenaline. dPPI is a function of the distance and conduction velocity between the entrained site and the reentrant circuit. It is also dependent on the electroanatomical properties of the entrained site. The slower the conduction velocity in the entrained area the greater will be the gain in time off the TCL should downstream capture occur (Figure 3 right-side panels A1, B1, C1). This is further facilitated by high output bipolar stimulation resulting in a large virtual electrode. The demonstration of a shorter PPI than TCL in the midlateral right atrium region aroused our suspicion and prompted extensive mapping in that region; eventually facilitating a successful ablation. The sites demonstrating shorter PPI than TCL are usually markers of slow conducting narrow critical isthmus and hence constitute good ablation targets. This is applicable in stable tachycardia with constant capture during entrainment where errors in measurement are ruled out. As this was a case report ethics clearance was not obtained. Patient consent was obtained prior to the procedure for publication of the patient clinical materials if found suitable in a medical journal. Hence, we request you to waive off the ethics committee clearance. The authors declare no conflict of interests for this article.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.721
Threshold uncertainty score0.606

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of ArrhythmiaSame topicCardiac Arrhythmias and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207