Type IV pili share a conserved mechanism of motor-independent retraction that is an inherent property of the pilus filament
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Type IV pili (T4P) are dynamic surface appendages that promote virulence, biofilm formation, horizontal gene transfer, and motility in diverse bacterial species. Pilus dynamic activity is best characterized in T4P that use distinct ATPase motors for pilus extension and retraction. Many T4P systems, however, lack a dedicated retraction motor and the mechanism underlying this motor-independent retraction remains a mystery. Using the Vibrio cholerae competence pilus as a model system, we identify mutations in the major pilin gene that enhance motor-independent retraction. These mutants produced less stable pili, likely due to diminished pilin-pilin interactions within the filament. One mutation adds a bulky residue to α1C, a universally conserved feature of type IV pilins. We found that inserting a bulky residue into α1C of the retraction motor-dependent Acinetobacter baylyi com-petence T4P is sufficient to induce motor-independent retraction. Conversely, removing bulky residues from α1C of the retraction motor-independent V. cholerae toxin-co-regulated T4P stabilizes the filament and prevents retraction. Furthermore, alignment of pilins from the broader type IV filament (T4F) family indicated that retraction motor-independent T4P, Com pili, and type II secretion systems generally encode larger residues within α1C oriented toward the pilus core compared to retraction motor-dependent T4P. Together, our data demonstrate that motor-independent retraction relies on the inherent instability of the pilus filament that may be conserved in diverse T4Fs. This provides the first evidence for a long-standing, yet untested, model in which pili retract in the absence of a motor by spontaneous de-polymerization. SIGNIFICANCE Extracellular pilus filaments are critical for the virulence and persistence of many bacterial pathogens. A crucial property of these filaments is their ability to dynamically extend and retract from the bacterial surface. A detailed mechanistic understanding of pilus retraction, however, remains lacking in many systems. Here, we reveal that pilus retraction is an inherent property of the pilus filament. These observations are broadly relevant to diverse pilus systems, including those in many bacterial pathogens, and may help inform novel therapeutic strategies that aim to target pilus dynamic activity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Direct model labels (unvalidated)
Per-model category and study-design labels from the labeling rounds. They are machine output, unvalidated, and the disagreement between models ships as data. No study design here is MEDLINE-validated yet.
| Model arm | Categories | Study design | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| gemma | no category Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no | Bench or experimental | high |
| gpt | no category Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no | Bench or experimental | high |
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedLabeled directly by 2 models reading the full record.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".