MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3128927856 · doi:10.7202/1074948ar

Défis de conservation et de réhabilitation du patrimoine industriel bâti face au changement climatique

2021· article· fr· W3128927856 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Richard Cantin

Bibliographic record

VenueEthnologies · 2021
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicConservation Techniques and Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceForestryHumanitiesGeographyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Depuis le XVIIIe siècle, les activités industrielles ont généré un patrimoine industriel bâti dont la richesse architecturale témoigne de nombreuses innovations constructives. En délaissant les matériaux naturels pour recourir aux matériaux artificiels, et en intégrant une nouvelle logique constructive, le secteur du bâtiment s’est industrialisée. Simultanément, l’essor des activités industrielles, fortement consommatrices d’énergies fossiles, a contribué à une augmentation anthropique des émissions de gaz à effet de serre qui ont transformé l’atmosphère terrestre. Aujourd’hui, l’évolution du climat implique des risques variables pour le patrimoine, et les impacts du changement climatique sont déjà nombreux. Ainsi, pendant deux siècles, l’industrialisation a façonné un patrimoine bâti qui aujourd’hui est menacé rétroactivement par le changement climatique qu’il a favorisé.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.622
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEthnologiesSame topicConservation Techniques and StudiesFrench-language works237,207