MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3128935179 · doi:10.24251/hicss.2021.231

Specialized CNT-based Sensor Framework for Advanced Motion Tracking

2021· article· en· W3128935179 on OpenAlexaff
Federico Gelsomini, Patrick C. K. Hung, Bill Kapralos, Álvaro Uribe-Quevedo, Michael Jenkin, Akira Tokuhiro, Kamen Kanev, Makoto Hosoda, Hidenori Mimura

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the ... Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences/Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials
Canadian institutionsYork UniversityOntario Tech University
FundersShizuoka UniversityResearch Center for Biomedical Engineering
KeywordsTracking (education)FidelityMatch movingComputer scienceTracking systemHigh fidelitySoftwareMotion (physics)WirelessWireless sensor networkEngineeringArtificial intelligenceTelecommunicationsElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this work, we discuss the design and development of an advanced framework for high-fidelity finger motion tracking based on Specialized Carbon Nanotube (CNT) stretchable sensors developed at our research facilities. Earlier versions of the CNT sensors have been employed in the high-fidelity finger motion tracking Data Glove commercialized by Yamaha, Japan. The framework presented in this paper encompasses our continuing research and development of more advanced CNT-based sensors and the implementation of novel high-fidelity motion tracking products based on them. The CNT sensor production and communication framework components are considered in detail and wireless motion tracking experiments with the developed hardware and software components integrated with the Yamaha Data Glove are reported.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the ... Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences/Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System SciencesSame topicAdvanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting MaterialsFrench-language works237,207