JARINGAN SARAF TIRUAN UNTUK MEMPREDIKSI JUMLAH PENGANGGURAN DI KOTA BINJAI DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN METODE BACKPROPAGATION
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Unemployment is a very complex problem because it affects and is influenced by several factors that interact with each other following a pattern that is not always easy to understand. The strategic problem in Binjai City is not much different from that in the Central Government of North Sumatra, namely the high unemployment rate, given the large number of workforce that appears every year, as well as several factors such as age levels and inflation in Binjai City, making it difficult for many people to find work. or what is called unemployment. The lack of maximum efforts by the government and the private sector in creating employment opportunities is one of the triggers for the increasing number of unemployed in Indonesia, especially coupled with the low level of public education and inadequate human resources, which makes people unable to find work. One of the methods used in predicting a data is Artificial Neural Network using the backpropagation method. With a maximum epoch between 0 - 10000 with a learning rate of 0.2 and a target error ranging from 0.01 to 0.1 to get convergent results. The results of the prediction of the number of unemployed can be predicted by some experiencing an average predicted increase and some experiencing a decrease.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it