Bibliographic record
Abstract
When I leave the hospital, I am not a physician. Or at least I do not identify as one. I define myself in a hundred other ways, but physician is not one of them. I think that comes from being a resident and, at times, lacking confidence in my ability to perform in my new role. After a month of working as the overnight psychiatry resident on call, I was familiar with delirium and capacity evaluations. I had done my share of Montreal Cognitive Assessments (MoCAs) and other cognitive assessments. But that night, I had a different job. I was staffing the heavy rescue truck at my volunteer rescue company, wondering what kind of exciting situations my overnight shift there might hold—a welcome change of pace from the psychiatry call room. When we were sent out for a lift assist, the scenario made famous by television ads for medical devices, I was not expecting much. It was the second time 911 had been called to the address that day. When we arrived, a middle-aged woman met us in the front yard, pleading for us to take her mother to the hospital, sharing a concerning series of events that stretched over the past several days. But then came the wrench—the patient did not want to go to the hospital. She refused. Earlier in the day, she had also refused and had been able to correctly identify the date, current president, and her current location, down to the zip code. That was enough evidence for the ambulance crew to trust her judgment and they had no choice but to leave her at home. It is hard enough to ensure a safe home environment for a patient when I am the consulting psychiatrist in a well-resourced hospital. However, here I was not acting in my role as a doctor. I was not in a hospital. I was a firefighter, and my patient was refusing the only care I could offer. At the daughter’s request, we entered the patient’s home, helped her off the floor, and then, just as I had done countless times as the psychiatrist on duty, began to listen to the patient. There were physical signs that concerned me about the patient’s ability to care for herself. But, just as she was earlier that day, she was appropriately oriented and conversant. While waiting for an ambulance crew to come and continue the evaluation, I listened. One of the benefits of psychiatry is the amount of time we are afforded to listen to our patients. I therefore tend to be more willing to listen to my rescue squad patients talk at length. This time, it turned out to be crucial. As we talked, the story and the timeline that emerged from the patient were vastly different from the story her daughter told us. None of it was overtly bizarre, but the details differed from the history the daughter had shared, and the more I pressed, the more obvious it became that the patient’s story was a complete confabulation. I found myself in familiar territory after all of those nights and delirium evaluations as a resident. I certainly do not carry the MoCA or Mini-Mental Status Exam in my bunker pants, a sharp contrast to always having several copies with me while on call, but I had done them enough recently to have parts of the evaluations memorized. Performing the parts of the test that evaluate attention such as serial 7’s and spelling “World” backwards gave me a lot of information about the patient’s cognitive state. It was not much information, but it was more than I could previously uncover. I knew what I would do in the hospital but this situation was different, as I was performing familiar work in a new territory. When the ambulance crew joined us, I gave my report and highlighted why the presentation was so concerning, then stepped back with my captain, and let the emergency medical technicians (EMTs) begin their evaluation. The back and forth stretched on for well over an hour, but the patient ultimately agreed to be transported to the local emergency room. As the patient was loaded into the ambulance and I climbed into the back of the rescue squad, I began to reflect on the experience. Almost 4 years previously, my experiences on the ambulance helped me figure out that psychiatry was the right specialty for me. In fact, my career as a volunteer firefighter and EMT helped guide me toward my current career in military medicine many times. I draw on my fire department experiences frequently when I am working with military patients in the hospital. I realized that for the first time, I was using my clinical experience in firefighting. In a small way, I was embracing my role and my identity as a physician. Montreal Cognitive Assessment—a cognitive screening test designed to assist health professionals in the detection of mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease. Bunker gear, otherwise known as turnout gear, is the fire-resistant protective clothing worn by firefighters. The views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy of the Department of Defense or the U.S. government. The author has no conflicts of interest to report.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.059 | 0.036 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".