Oil Sands Consultations : Aboriginal consultation final report
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The pace and scale of oil sands development is outstripping the ability of the federal and provincial governments to protect the regional, national and global environment and climate. This document identified the principles that guide the future development of Alberta's oil sands. It reflected the views and input of several environmental and industry organizations, First Nations and Metis groups, municipalities and private citizens in Alberta. It also included long-term action plans and strategies for the sustainable development of oil sands. This report provided an overview of the Aboriginal consultation processes, as well the broad range of recommendations that First Nations and Metis developed to address some of the immediate growth pressures associated with oil sands development. The recommendations were drafted after extensive public consultations held throughout the province over the last year. They included recommendations on the impacts on the environment; First Nations rights and interests; communication and relationship building; First Nations consultation; impacts on First Nations Communities; and economic participation. The report reflected the priority of the Alberta Government to govern with integrity and transparency, manage growth pressures, improve Albertans' quality of life and promote safe and secure communities. tabs., figs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".