Chronic PTSD and other psychological sequelae in a group of frontline healthcare workers who contracted and survived SARS.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) epidemic of 2003 was highly concentrated in health care settings and resulted in a high number of health care workers (HCWs) contracting the disease The SARS epidemic has improved our understanding of how trauma impacts frontline HCWs who serve as first responders during an infectious disease outbreak However, our insight into the trajectory of frontline HCWs' morbidity posttrauma continues to be limited, as the majority of the previous work has focused on the short-term or immediate impact of SARS on HCWs, with only a few studies dedicated to the evaluation of its long-term or sustained impact Previous research into the long-term impact of SARS on HCWs spans 1-3 years postoutbreak The present study extends previous research by examining HCWs up to 7 years postoutbreak More specifically, frontline HCWs who contracted and survived SARS were evaluated at 1 year (2004), 4 years (2007), and 7 years (2010) postoutbreak by using a within-participants design Across all three time points, frontline HCWs showed a lack of abatement in clinically significant levels of depression, anxiety, and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptomatology In addition, HCWs reported below average and persistent functional outcomes, such as problems with pain, reduced vitality, and reductions in physical, mental, and social functioning Finally, we report on the particular psychiatric variables from 1 year postoutbreak that are significantly associated with functional debility at 4 and 7 years postoutbreak Findings of this study underscore the importance of understanding the long-term sequelae of infectious disease outbreaks on frontline HCWs, in order to decrease the likelihood of chronic adverse outcomes in this population This information is especially relevant now, given the current global outbreak of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved) Abstract (French) L'epidemie de syndrome respiratoire aigu severe (SRAS) de 2003 s'est grandement manifestee dans les milieux de soins de sante, et un grand nombre de travailleurs de la sante (TS) ont contracte la maladie L'epidemie de SRAS a grandement ameliore notre comprehension de l'incidence d'un traumatisme parmi les TS de premiere ligne qui constituent les premiers intervenants durant les eclosions d'une maladie infectieuse Toutefois, nos connaissances sur la trajectoire de la morbidite post-traumatique parmi les TS de premiere ligne restent limitees, car la majorite des recherches anterieures ont porte sur les effets immediats ou a court terme du SRAS sur les TS;quelques etudes seulement etaient destinees a evaluer son incidence soutenue ou a long terme Les recherches anterieures sur les effets a long terme du SRAS sur les TS s'etendaient sur 1 a 3 ans post-epidemie La presente etude pousse plus loin les recherches precedentes en examinant les TS jusqu'a 7 ans apres l'epidemie Plus precisement, les TS de premiere ligne qui ont survecu a une infection au SRAS ont ete evalues a 1 an (2004), a 4 ans (2007) et a 7 ans (2010) apres l'epidemie dans le cadre d'une etude de conception intrasujet Aux trois points, on a constate chez les TS de premiere ligne un manque de reduction des symptomes de depression, d'anxiete et du trouble de stress post-traumatique (TSPT) de niveaux cliniquement significatifs De plus, les TS ont rapporte des resultats fonctionnels inferieurs a la moyenne et persistants, tels que de la douleur, une vitalite diminuee et une diminution du fonctionnement physique, mental et social Finalement, nous rapportons des variables psychiatriques particulieres depuis l'annee 1 post-epidemie, qui sont significativement associees a une souffrance fonctionnelle aux annees 4 et 7 post-epidemie Les resultats de cette etude soulignent l'importance de comprendre les sequelles a long terme des eclosions de maladies infectieuses parmi les TS, afin de reduire les probabilites de problemes chroniques parmi cette population Cette information est particulierement pertinente aujourd'hui etant donne la pandemie de coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved) Impact Statement Public Significance Statement-The present study is one of a few studies that has thus far examined the long-term impact of an infectious disease outbreak on frontline healthcare workers A group of Canadian frontline healthcare workers who contracted and survived SARS were evaluated at 1 year (2004), 4 years (2007), and 7 years (2010) postoutbreak Across all three time points, frontline healthcare workers reported clinically significant levels of anxiety, depression, and PTSD symptomatology, in addition to adverse functional outcomes (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".