A Fusion Algorithm for Saccade Eye Movement Enhancement With EOG and Lumped-Element Models
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Electrooculography (EOG) can be used to measure eye movements while the eyelids are open or closed and to assist in the diagnosis of certain eye diseases. However, challenges in biosignal acquisition and processing lead to limited accuracy, limited resolution (both temporal and spatial), as well as difficulties in reducing noise and detecting artifacts. Methods such as finite impulse response, wavelet transforms, and averaging filters have been used to denoise and enhance EOG measurements. However, these filters are not specifically designed to detect saccades, and so key features (e.g., saccade amplitude) can be over-filtered and distorted as a consequence of the filtering process. Here we present a model-based fusion technique to enhance saccade features within noisy and raw EOG signals. Specifically, we focus on Westheimer (WH) and linear reciprocal (LR) eye models with a Kalman filter. EOG signals were measured using OpenBCI's Cyton Board (at 250 Hz), and these measurements were compared with a state-of-the-art EyeLink 1000 (EL; 250 Hz) eye tracker. On average, the LR model-based KF produced a 47% improvement of measurement accuracy over the bandpass filters. Thus, we conclude that our LR model-based KF outperforms standard bandpass filtering techniques in reducing noise, eliminating artifacts, and restoring missing features of saccade signatures present within EOG signals.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it