La méditation de pleine conscience dans l’intervention en soins spirituels avec les patients en psychiatrie
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Au cours des dernières années, dans la foulée du programme de méditation pleine conscience élaboré par Jon Kabat Zinn, les services de soins spirituels intègrent de plus en plus la médiation au sein de leurs interventions. Cet article présente les résultats d’une recherche visant à évaluer les effets d’un programme de méditation « Soin spirituel pour un mieux-être » sur diverses dimensions psychiques et spirituelles. Les données ont été recueillies auprès de 21 patients suivis en externe en psychiatrie à l’Hôpital de l’Enfant-Jésus selon 3 temps de mesure : avant le programme, immédiatement à la fin du programme et 3 mois après. Les résultats suggèrent une amélioration chez les patients immédiatement à la fin du programme mais qui tend à s’atténuer 3 mois plus tard. Cette recherche pose, entre autres, des questions concernant les mesures d’évaluation de la dimension spirituelle.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".