MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3129224332 · doi:10.1109/tuffc.2021.3062071

Dual-Frequency CMUT Arrays for Multiband Ultrasound Imaging Applications

2021· article· en· W3129224332 on OpenAlexafffund
Mohammad Maadi, Christopher Ceroici, Roger J. Zemp

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUltrasound Imaging and Elastography
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchAlberta InnovatesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMitacs
KeywordsCapacitive micromachined ultrasonic transducersTransducerUltrasonic sensorAcousticsMaterials scienceImage resolutionSecond-harmonic imaging microscopyCapacitive sensingLow frequencyComputer scienceOpticsEngineeringElectrical engineeringPhysicsTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dual-frequency capacitive micromachined ultrasonic transducers (CMUTs) are introduced for multiscale imaging applications, where a single array transducer can be used for both deep low-resolution imaging and shallow high-resolution imaging. These transducers consist of low- and high-frequency membranes interlaced within each subarray element. They are fabricated using a modified sacrificial release process. Successful performance is demonstrated using wafer-level vibrometer testing, as well as acoustic testing on wirebonded dies consisting of arrays of 2- and 9-MHz elements of up to 64 elements for each subarray. The arrays are demonstrated to provide multiscale, multiresolution imaging using wire phantoms and can span frequencies from 2 MHz up to as high as 17 MHz. Peak transmit sensitivities of 27 and 7.5 kPa/V are achieved with the low- and high-frequency subarrays, respectively. At 16-mm imaging depth, lateral spatial resolution achieved is 0.84 and 0.33 mm for low- and high-frequency subarrays, respectively. The signal-to-noise ratio of the low-frequency subarray is significantly higher for deep targets compared to the high-frequency subarray. The array achieves multiband imaging capabilities difficult to achieve with current transducer technologies and may have applications to multipurpose probes and novel contrast agent imaging schemes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics Ferroelectrics and Frequency ControlSame topicUltrasound Imaging and ElastographyFrench-language works237,207