A quantitative assessment of dual energy computed tomography‐based material decomposition for imaging bone marrow edema associated with acute knee injury
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: This study developed methods to quantify and improve the accuracy of dual-energy CT (DECT)-based bone marrow edema imaging using a clinical CT system. Objectives were: (a) to quantitatively compare DECT with gold-standard, fluid-sensitive MRI for imaging of edema-like marrow signal intensity (EMSI) and (b) to identify image analysis parameters that improve delineation of EMSI associated with acute knee injury on DECT images. METHODS: DECT images from ten participants with acute knee injury were decomposed into estimated fractions of bone, healthy marrow, and edema based on energy-dependent differences in tissue attenuation. Fluid-sensitive MR images were registered to DECT for quantitative, voxel-by-voxel comparison between the two modalities. An optimization scheme was developed to find attenuation coefficients for healthy marrow and edema that improved EMSI delineation, compared to MRI. DECT method accuracy was evaluated by measuring dice coefficients, mutual information, and normalized cross correlation between the DECT result and registered MRI. RESULTS: When applying the optimized three-material decomposition method, dice coefficients for EMSI identified through DECT vs MRI were 0.32 at the tibia and 0.13 at the femur. Optimization of attenuation coefficients improved dice coefficient, mutual information, and cross-correlation between DECT and gold-standard MRI by 48%-107% compared to three-material decomposition using non-optimized parameters, and improved mutual information and cross-correlation by 39%-58% compared to the manufacturer-provided two-material decomposition. CONCLUSIONS: This study quantitatively evaluated the performance of DECT in imaging knee injury-associated EMSI and identified a method to optimize DECT-based visualization of complex tissues (marrow and edema) whose attenuation parameters cannot be easily characterized. Further studies are needed to improve DECT-based EMSI imaging at the femur.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".