MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3129328922 · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-222735/v1

Investigating and modelling risk factors for primary postpartum haemorrhage among childbearing Women in the Northern Province of Rwanda: A Case Control Study

2021· preprint· en· W3129328922 on OpenAlexafffund
Oliva Bazirete, Manassé Nzayirambaho, Aline Umubyeyi, Innocent Karangwa, Marilyn Evans

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Square · 2021
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTrauma and Emergency Care Studies
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersGovernment of CanadaGlobal Affairs CanadaUniversity of Rwanda
KeywordsMedicinePoisson regressionObstetricsRelative riskObservational studyPregnancyMaternal deathGynecologyPopulationEnvironmental healthConfidence intervalInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: The vast majority of maternal deaths occur in Low- and Middle-Income Countries. Postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) remains a major global burden contributing to high maternal mortality and morbidity rates. Assessment of PPH risk factors should be undertaken during antenatal, intrapartum and postpartum periods for timely prevention of maternal morbidity and mortality associated with PPH. The aim of this study is to investigate and model risk factors for primary PPH in Rwanda. Methods: We conducted an observational case-control study of 430 (108 cases: 322 controls) pregnant women with gestational age of 32 weeks and above who gave birth in five selected health facilities of Rwanda between January and June 2020. Poisson regression, a generalized linear model with a log link and a Poisson distribution was used to estimate the risk ratio of factors associated with PPH. The research protocol was approved by the University of Rwanda, College of Medicine and Health Sciences Institutional Ethics Review Board. Results: The overall prevalence of primary PPH was 25.2%. The following risk factors were identified: antepartum haemorrhage (RR=3.36; 95% CI 1.80- 6.26, P<0.001); intrauterine fetal death (RR=1.93; 95% CI 0.93- 4.03, P<0.077); multiple pregnancy (RR=1.83; 95% CI 1.11- 3.01, P=0.016); haemoglobin level <11 gr/dL (RR=1.51; 95% CI 1.00- 2.30, P=0.050), and premature rupture of membranes (RR=0.58; 95% CI 0.32- 1.05, P<0.077). During the intrapartum and immediate postpartum period, the main causes of primary PPH were: uterine atony (RR=6.70; 95% CI 4.78- 9.38, P<0.001), retained tissues (RR= 4.32; 95% CI 2.87- 6.51, P<0.001); and lacerations of genital organs after birth (RR= 2.14; 95% CI 1.49- 3.09, P<0.001). Coagulopathy was not prevalent in primary PPH. Conclusion: Based on our findings, uterine atony remain the foremost cause of primary PPH. As well as other established risk factors for PPH, antepartum haemorrhage and intra uterine fetal death should be included as risk factors in the development and validation of prediction models for PPH. Large scale studies are needed to investigate further potential PPH risk factors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.043
Threshold uncertainty score0.086

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch SquareSame topicTrauma and Emergency Care StudiesFrench-language works237,207