MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3129339474 · doi:10.1101/2021.02.19.431970

Insights into the regulatory mechanisms of <i>Clostridioides difficile</i> biofilm formation

2021· preprint· en· W3129339474 on OpenAlexaff
Anthony M. Buckley, Duncan Ewin, Inês B. Moura, Mark H. Wilcox, Gill Douce

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2021
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicClostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Infection and Immunity
FundersUniversity of GlasgowRosetrees TrustWellcome Trust
KeywordsBiofilmVirulenceMicrobiologyBiologyMutantBacillus subtilisBacteriaClostridioidesMultidrug toleranceGeneCell biologyBiochemistryGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Mucosal biofilms play an important role in intestinal health; however, the mucosal bacterial community has been implicated in persistent infections. Clostridioides difficile is an important nosocomial pathogen, with an unacceptable high rate of recurrence following antibiotic treatment. As C. difficile is a known biofilm producer, a property which may contribute to this suboptimal therapeutic response, we have investigated the transcriptional changes and regulatory pathways during the transition from planktonic to biofilm mode of growth. Widespread metabolic reprogramming during biofilm formation was detected, characterised by an increased usage of glycine metabolic pathways to yield key metabolites, which are used for energy production and synthesis of short chain fatty acids. We detected the expression of 107 small non-coding RNAs that appear to, in some part, regulate these pathways; however, 25 of these small RNAs were specifically expressed during biofilm formation, indicating they may play a role in regulating biofilm-specific genes. Similar to Bacillus subtilis , biofilm formation is a multi-regulatory process and SinR negatively regulates biofilm formation independently of other known mechanisms. This comprehensive analysis furthers our understanding of biofilm formation in C. difficile , identifies potential targets for anti-virulence factors, and provides evidence of the link between metabolism and virulence traits.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicClostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research→French-language works237,207→