MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3129347652 · doi:10.1097/opx.0000000000001647

Scleral Lens Issues and Complications; Their Recognition, Etiology, and ManagementDaddiFadelDundas, Ontario, Canada: Dougmar Publishing Group, Inc.; 2020. $99.00

2021· article· en· W3129347652 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Barry A. Weissman

Bibliographic record

VenueOptometry and Vision Science · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOcular Surface and Contact Lens
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScleral lensContact lensEtiologyMedicineOptometryMandateLens (geology)OphthalmologyPolitical sciencePathologyLawPhysicsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Scleral Lens Issues and Complications; Their Recognition, Etiology, and Management. Fadel D. Dundas, Ontario, Canada: Dougmar Publishing Group, Inc.; 2020. $99.00.Contact Lens Spectrum's 2020 GP Annual Report states, “…scleral lens use continues to increase and may soon rival corneal lenses as the primary GP design prescribed….” With the dramatic increase in utilization of gas-permeable scleral contact lenses over the last few years comes an ongoing mandate for distribution of clinical knowledge. To this end, Fadel states in the preface that she intends to transmit her passion, dedication, and devotion for scleral lenses with the goal of helping practitioners bring their benefits to patients and “change lives.” She divides clinical scleral lens problems into “issues” that do not lead to persistent tissue morbidity and “complications” that may damage vision. The author is clearly a European leader in this field, exemplified by her credentials and publications. On the positive side, the illustrations are appropriate, copious, and compelling. The text and tables are clinically based and thorough and offer the scleral lens fitter—either novice or those with experience—a differential etiology, diagnoses, and management outline for each problem the clinician might encounter. I found the embedded hyperlinked videos compelling and innovative. Daddi Fadel's text is clearly a contribution to the literature in this area of contact lens practice. Unfortunately, the text is not always smooth and is occasionally unclear. Extensive tables and outlines have been used instead of text; some may find this beneficial, while others less so. There is little discussion of any issue or complication in depth. There is also little in the way of guidance on distinguishing between the various differential diagnoses and management options presented for each problem. After chapter 2, references do not follow each chapter but are instead inserted at the end of each subsection inside chapters. References are not annotated in the text but offered as background to the reader should they care to further investigate the discussed topic. This may be advantageous to some but falls short of evidence-based medicine guidelines and expectations. Unfortunately, complication management in this text is incomplete for the 2020 North American OD; neither referral nor medical treatment protocols are noted, with perhaps rare exception (e.g., treatment of dry eye and ocular surface disease). Notably, the text lacks the current management of serious complications such as microbial keratitis and corneal infiltrates. Although preventive and contact lens measures are detailed in expansive tables and in outlines and discussion, appropriate referral, antibiotics, and/or steroids to treat suspected or confirmed active corneal infection are lacking. Moreover, the impact of systemic blood pressure and/or prior steroid use as potential etiologies of intracorneal or subconjunctival hemorrhage is excluded. I suspect such medical management lies outside the author's European training and practice scope, but it is an omission for those whose practice includes medical optometry. This text is a labor of love for the author, who organizes and shares with her readers her own “state of the art” modern scleral lens practice. In that regard, she is successful and should be lauded. Nevertheless, clinicians practicing with expanded optometric scope that includes medical management may need to go beyond this text for guidance on contemporary diagnostic, treatment, and management protocols for scleral lens complications. Barry A. Weissman, OD, PhD, FAAO (Dip CCLRS) Southern California College of Optometry at Marshall B. Ketchum University Fullerton, California Stein Eye Institute David Geffen School of Medicine University of California, Los Angeles Los Angeles, California [email protected]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.151
Threshold uncertainty score0.506

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1510.060

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOptometry and Vision ScienceSame topicOcular Surface and Contact LensFrench-language works237,207