MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3129377017 · doi:10.37570/bgsd-2005-52-01

First direct age determinationfor the Kelseaa Dolerite Dyke, Bornholm, Denmark

2005· article· en· W3129377017 on OpenAlexaff
Paul Martin Holm, Leif-Erik Pedersen, L. M. Heaman

Bibliographic record

VenueBulletin of the Geological Society of Denmark · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyBaltic ShieldProterozoicIntrusionGeochemistryMaficShieldPrecambrianPetrologySeismologyTectonics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Danish island Bornholm on the southwestern margin of the Baltic Shield was subject to dyke injection during the Proterozoic. The dykes probably result from several magmatic events. We present U-Pb geochronological data for the largest of the dykes, the tholeiitic Kelseaa dyke. The resulting age, 1326 ±10 (2σ) Ma, places the dyke significantly earlier in the Proterozoic than previously assumed. No other dykes of this age have been reported from the western part of the Baltic Shield. The NE–SW strike of the Kelseaa dyke is evidence for extension oblique to the border of the Baltic Shield.The Kelseaa dyke is the first evidence for this event that was subsequent to the emplacement of theBornholm and Karlshamn (SE Sweden) granites and prior to the intrusion of the Central Scandinavian Dolerite Group, and possibly also the majority of mafic dykes on Bornholm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.060
Threshold uncertainty score0.119

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBulletin of the Geological Society of DenmarkSame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207