Fast full-field modulation transfer function analysis for photographic lens quality assessment
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Full-field modulation transfer function (MTF) data based on the slanted-edge method can give useful insights on the performance of a photographic lens sample and its shortcomings. Decentering and other out-of-tolerance states are recognized easily. A process to derive accurate lens MTF from slanted-edge spatial frequency response measurements is presented, covering chart design and alignment, data capture by standard digital cameras, slanted-edge algorithm implementation requirements, sensor and chart MTF corrections, and also visualization of the results. It is demonstrated that the reliability of the measured MTF values is by far good enough to support automated quality assessment with a measurement accuracy of ≈0.02 MTF and repeatability of ≲0.005 up to 100 c/mm. The measured full-field MTF values provide an unambiguous numerical criterion for comparison with expectations based on lens design.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it