MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3129465484 · doi:10.1111/trf.16328

<scp>COVID</scp>‐19 convalescent plasma: Interim recommendations from the <scp>AABB</scp>

2021· review· en· W3129465484 on OpenAlexaff
Claudia S. Cohn, Lise J Estcourt, Brenda J. Grossman, Monica B. Pagano, Elizabeth S. Allen, Evan M. Bloch, Arturo Casadevall, Dana V. Devine, Nancy M. Dunbar, Farid Foroutan, Thomas J. Gniadek, Ruchika Goel, Jed B. Gorlin, Michael J. Joyner, Ryan A. Metcalf, Jay S. Raval, Todd W. Rice, Beth H. Shaz, Ralph R. Vassallo, Jeffrey L. Winters, Gregory Beaudoin, Aaron A.R. Tobian

Bibliographic record

VenueTransfusion · 2021
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCOVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
Canadian institutionsTed Rogers Centre for Heart ResearchUniversity Health NetworkCanadian Blood Services
FundersNational Institute for Health and Care Research
KeywordsConvalescent plasmaCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Interim2019-20 coronavirus outbreakSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)VirologyBetacoronavirusMedicineInternal medicinePolitical scienceOutbreak

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The authors have no substantial conflicts of interest.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.050
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.825
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.050
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.159
GPT teacher head0.460
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations44
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransfusionSame topicCOVID-19 Clinical Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207