Automated assignment of cell identity from single-cell multiplexed imaging and proteomic data
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The creation of scalable single-cell and highly-multiplexed imaging technologies that profile the protein expression and phosphorylation status of heterogeneous cellular populations has led to multiple insights into disease processes including cancer initiation and progression. A major analytical challenge in interpreting the resulting data is the assignment of cells to a priori known cell types in a robust and interpretable manner. Existing approaches typically solve this by clustering cells followed by manual annotation of individual clusters or by strategies that gate protein expression at predefined thresholds. However, these often require several subjective analysis choices such as selecting the number of clusters and do not automatically assign cell types in line with prior biological knowledge. They further lack the ability to explicitly assign cells to an unknown or uncharacterized type, which exist in most highly multiplexed imaging experiments due to the limited number of markers quantified. To address these issues we present Astir, a probabilistic model to assign cells to cell types by integrating prior knowledge of marker proteins. Astir uses deep recognition neural networks for fast Bayesian inference, allowing for cell type annotations at the million-cell scale and in the absence of previously annotated reference data across multiple experimental modalities and antibody panels. We demonstrate that Astir outperforms existing approaches in terms of accuracy and robustness by applying it to over 2.1 million single cells from several suspension and imaging mass cytometry and microscopy datasets in multiple tissue contexts. We further showcase that Astir can be used for the fast analysis of the spatial architecture of the tumour microenvironment, automatically quantifying the immune influx and spatial heterogeneity of patient samples. Astir is freely available as an open source Python package at https://www.github.com/camlab-bioml/astir .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".