Soutien des milieux de vie au bien-être d’enfants et d’adultes traités pour une tumeur cérébrale pédiatrique
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’étude met en valeur le point de vue de survivants d’une tumeur cérébrale pédiatrique (enfants et adultes) sur les aspects positifs et à améliorer du soutien reçu dans six milieux de vie. L’analyse de contenu des 49 entrevues individuelles met en lumière le soutien réel ou potentiel de tous les milieux. Le rôle majeur du soutien affectif et la nécessité de définir finement le soutien instrumental ressortent. Si l’entourage est très présent, l’apport de milieux plus distaux pourrait être davantage mis à contribution. Vu les effets à long terme de la maladie, soutenir les adultes survivants semble crucial à leur bien-être et leur participation sociale.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it