Utilitarismo repaginado: uma faceta do neoliberalismo contemporâneo
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article presents results of an investigation that aimed to identify meanings that high school students attribute to the relevance of the utilitarianism of school knowledge. The theoretical bases come from the studies of Michel Foucault and his commentators, such as Sibilia, Ball and Dardot and Laval. The empirical part was carried out in a public school in the metropolitan region of Porto Alegre (RS), in the academic year of 2017. The material scrutinized consists of questionnaires answered by students who attended the last stage of basic education about their conceptions about the school and high school today. The analysis showed that the school can still be thought of as a machinery capable of producing students for a given social function, aimed at the job market. At the same time, it has been captured by the marketing perspective, encouraging students to act in order to become entrepreneurs of their own, making investments based on calculations of interests that guarantee them a prominent place in the competitive scenario.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.037 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".