MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3129585455 · doi:10.5075/epfl-thesis-10404

The Learnability of the Grammar of Jazz: Bayesian Inference of Hierarchical Structures in Harmony

2020· article· en· W3129585455 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Daniel Harasim

Bibliographic record

VenueInfoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMusic and Audio Processing
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaTechnische Universität DresdenDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftEuropean Commission
KeywordsLearnabilityHarmony (color)Artificial intelligenceInferenceGrammarNatural language processingBayesian inferenceGrammar inductionComputer scienceLinguisticsMathematicsBayesian probabilityPhilosophyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Musical grammar describes a set of principles that are used to understand and interpret the structure of a piece according to a musical style. The main topic of this study is grammar induction for harmony --- the process of learning structural principles from the observation of chord sequences. The question how grammars are learnable by induction from sequential data is an instance of the more general question how abstract knowledge is inducible from the observation of data --- a central question of cognitive science. Under the assumption that human learning approximately follows the principles of rational reasoning, Bayesian models of cognition can be used to simulate learning processes. This study investigates what prior knowledge makes it possible to learn musical grammar inductively from Jazz chord sequences using Bayesian models and computational simulations. The theoretical part of the thesis presents how questions about learnability can be studied in a unified framework involving music analysis, cognitive modeling, Bayesian statistics, and computational simulations. A new grammar formalism, called Probabilistic Abstract Context-Free Grammar (PACFG), is proposed that allows for flexible probability models which facilitate the grammar-induction experiments of this study. PACFG can jointly model multiple musical dimensions such as harmony and rhythm, and can use coordinate ascent variational inference for grammar learning. The empirical part of the thesis reports supervised and unsupervised grammar-learning experiments. To train and evaluate grammar models, a ground-truth dataset of hierarchical analyses of complete Jazz standards, called the Jazz Harmony Treebank (JHT), was created. The supervised grammar-learning experiments, in which grammars for Jazz harmony are learned from the JHT analyses, show that jointly modeling harmony and rhythm significantly improves the grammar models' prediction of the ground truth. The performance and robustness of the grammars are further improved by a transpositionally invariant parameterization of rule probabilities. Following the supervised grammar learning, unsupervised grammar learning was performed by inducing harmony grammars merely from Jazz chord sequences, without the observation of the JHT trees. The results show that the best induced grammar performs similarly well as the best supervised grammar. In particular, the goal-directedness of functional harmony does not need to be assumed a priori, but can be learned without usage of music-specific prior knowledge. The findings of this thesis show that general prior knowledge enables an ideal learner to acquire abstract musical principles by statistical learning. In conclusion, it is plausible that much aspects of musical grammar have been learned by Jazz musicians and listeners, instead of being innate predispositions or explicitly taught concepts. This thesis is moreover embedded into the context of empirical music research and digital humanities. Current studies either describe complex musical structures qualitatively or investigate simpler aspects quantitatively. The computational models developed in this thesis demonstrate that deep insights into music and statistical analyses are not mutually exclusive. They enable a new kind of data-driven music theory and musicology, for instance through comparative analyses of musical grammar for different styles such as Jazz, Rock, and Western classical music.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.597
Threshold uncertainty score0.554

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInfoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne)Same topicMusic and Audio ProcessingFrench-language works237,207