PENGGANTIAN KELAMIN BAGI TRANSEKSUAL DAN AKIBAT HUKUMNYA TERHADAP KEABSAHAN PERKAWINAN DITINJAU DARI UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 1 TAHUN 1974 TENTANG PERKAWINAN
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<p>Abstract<br />This article aims to examine the ratification of changes in legal status and gender replacement procedures in population documents for transsexuals in Indonesia, as well as the legality of marriages for transsexuals in terms of Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage. The research method used is a type of normative legal research, with a qualitative approach. The legal materials used are primary and secondary legal materials, with data collection techniques used are literature study or document study techniques. Based on the results of the study, it was concluded that in Indonesia there are no specific rules regarding sex change, but for judges they cannot refuse a case because the law does not exist or is unclear. Regarding the procedure for changing sexes in population documents regulated in Act Number 23 of 2006 concerning Population Administration and Presidential Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia Number 25 of 2008 concerning Requirements and Procedures for Population Registration and Civil Registration. Then regarding the validity of marriage for transsexuals, from the six religions recognized by the government as the official religion in Indonesia, namely Islam, Christianity, Catholicism, Hinduism, Buddhism, and Confucianism, do not legalize a marriage carried out by parties, one of whom is a transsexual who has gone through Sex Reassignment Surgery. <br />Keywords: Sex Reassignment; Transsexual; Legality of Marriage.</p><p>Abstrak<br />Artikel ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji pengesahan perubahan status hukum dan prosedur penggantian jenis kelamin di dokumen kependudukan bagi transeksual di Indonesia, serta keabsahan perkawinan bagi transeksual ditinjau dari Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah jenis penelitian hukum normatif, dengan pendekatan kualitatif. Bahan hukum yang digunakan adalah bahan hukum primer dan sekunder, dengan teknik pengumpulan data yang digunakan adalah teknik studi kepustakaan atau studi dokumen. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian, disimpulkan bahwa di Indonesia belum ada aturan khusus mengenai penggantian jenis kelamin, namun bagi hakim tidak boleh menolak suatu perkara karena Undang-Undang tidak ada atau tidak jelas. Mengenai prosedur penggantian jenis kelamin di dokumen kependudukan diatur dalam Undang- Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2006 tentang Administrasi Kependudukan dan Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 25 Tahun 2008 tentang Persyaratan dan Tata Cara Pendaftaran Penduduk dan Pencatatan Sipil. Kemudian mengenai keabsahan perkawinan bagi transeksual, dari keenam agama yang diakui pemerintah sebagai agama resmi di Indonesia yaitu Islam, Kristen, Katolik, Hindu, Buddha, dan Khonghucu, tidak mensahkan suatu perkawinan yang dilaksanakan oleh para pihak yang salah satunya seorang transeksual yang telah melalui operasi penggantian kelamin.<br />Kata Kunci: Penggantian Kelamin; Transeksual; Keabsahan Perkawinan.</p>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it