Continuous Probabilistic Skyline Query for Secure Worker Selection in Mobile Crowdsensing
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Worker selection is always one of the most fundamental problems in mobile crowdsensing (MCS), since the reliability of workers' sensing data is hugely significant to the service quality. In the worker selection process, it is inevitable for the workers to share some of their sensitive information. Consequently, numerous studies are conducted on the problem of privacy-preserving worker selection in MCS platforms. However, most of the existing methods focus on static and short-term situations. As a result, they are inapplicable to the highly dynamic environments where the MCS tasks are long term and the workers can continuously arrive at/leave the system. To solve these problems, in this article, we propose a privacy-preserving worker selection scheme based on the probabilistic skyline over sliding windows. Specifically, the proposed scheme can select reliable workers for each current sliding window in terms of working experience, expiry time, and trustability. Besides, we design an ElGamal encryption-based scheme for securely outsourcing and comparing workers' personal information without revealing their privacy. Detailed security analysis shows that the workers' sensitive information, e.g., working experience and trustability, are not revealed to any authorized parties during the process of MCS under our security model. Furthermore, extensive experiments on both real-world and simulated data sets demonstrate that our proposed scheme outperforms the baseline method in two application scenarios, i.e., 1) continuous worker arrival and 2) continuous worker departure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".