The potential of observed soil moisture dynamics for predicting summer evapotranspiration in a successional chronosequence
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract. The hydrology of ecosystem succession gives rise to new challenges for the analysis and modeling of water balance components. Recent large-scale alterations of forest cover across the globe suggest that a significant portion of new biophysical environments will influence the long-term dynamics and limits of water fluxes compared to pre-succession conditions. This study explores the potential of modeling actual evapotranspiration (AET) in the summer along a successional forest by observed soil moisture dynamics. We applied two parsimonious data-driven soil water balance models to the Canadian FLUXNET sites at Campbell River, British Columbia. Simulated AET was compared to water vapor measurements from 2001 to 2008 and the models' sensitivity to inter-annual climatic variability and computation time step was tested. With the exception of the mature forest during an extremely dry summer, the results confirm the potential of using observed soil moisture dynamics as a method to estimate summer AET within an acceptable error range albeit substantial differences along the successional forested ecosystem. The study suggests that summer AET could be estimated and monitored in many more places than those equipped with eddy-covariance or sap-flow measurements to advance the understanding of the water balance of different successional ecosystems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".