MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3129722960 · doi:10.14740/cr1219

Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio at Admission as a Predictor of In-Hospital and Long-Term Outcomes in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2021· review· en· W3129722960 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCardiology Research · 2021
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInflammatory Biomarkers in Disease Prognosis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMacePercutaneous coronary interventionMyocardial infarctionInternal medicineConventional PCICardiologyAcute coronary syndromeOdds ratioNeutrophil to lymphocyte ratioConfidence intervalCochrane LibraryLymphocyte

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is the most severe form of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) which is associated with significant adverse outcomes. Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) is a novel inflammatory biomarker that has been used as a predictor of various cardiovascular diseases, including ACS. This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the prognostic value of PLR as a predictor of in-hospital and long-term outcomes in patients with STEMI undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods: We performed a comprehensive systematic literature search in the databases of PubMed, ScienceDirect, Cochrane Library, and ProQuest for eligible studies. The primary outcomes were major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) and mortality, both in-hospital and long-term follow-up. The outcomes were compared between patients with high and low admission PLR. The quality assessment was conducted using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Review Manager 5.3 was used to perform the meta-analysis. Results: Six cohort studies involving 4,289 STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled analysis showed that a high PLR at admission was associated with increased in-hospital MACE (odds ratio (OR) = 1.94, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.56 - 2.40, P < 0.00001, I 2 = 45%) and in-hospital mortality (OR = 2.07; 95% CI = 1.53 - 2.80; P < 0.00001; I 2 = 50%), as well as increased long-term MACE (OR = 1.98; 95% CI = 1.31 - 3.00; P = 0.001; I 2 = 72%) and long-term mortality (OR = 2.79; 95% CI = 1.45 - 5.36; P = 0.002; I 2 = 83%). Conclusions: In patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI, a high PLR at admission predicts in-hospital MACE and mortality along with long-term MACE and mortality. Cardiol Res. 2021;12(2):109-116 doi: https://doi.org/10.14740/cr1219

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.457
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0080.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.366
Teacher spread0.315 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it