L’oubli des origines du premier « duché » d’Aquitaine au VIIe siècle
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans la première moitié du VIIIe siècle, le duché d’Aquitaine (que certains historiens osent appeler « royaume ») est sans doute la principale force politique opposée aux maires du palais pippinides, puis aux rois carolingiens. Pourtant, les origines de cette Aquitaine ducale se perdent dans un flou relatif, car celui qui a longtemps été considéré comme son premier maître au VIIe siècle, le « duc » Félix, n’est mentionné que dans une unique source, le premier recueil des miracles de saint Martial de Limoges. Or, cette source est problématique et il est bien possible que Félix n’ait en fait jamais existé ; les origines du duché d’Aquitaine auraient alors été « oubliées » au sens premier du terme. Le présent article se propose d’interroger l’absence de mémoire des origines concernant le duché d’Aquitaine au VIIe siècle, mais aussi la construction historiographique opérée postérieurement afin de combler cette lacune documentaire.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".