MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3129738377 · doi:10.4000/e-spania.38211

L’oubli des origines du premier « duché » d’Aquitaine au VIIe siècle

2021· article· fr· W3129738377 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuee-Spania · 2021
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
Canadian institutionsCanadian Heritage
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dans la première moitié du VIIIe siècle, le duché d’Aquitaine (que certains historiens osent appeler « royaume ») est sans doute la principale force politique opposée aux maires du palais pippinides, puis aux rois carolingiens. Pourtant, les origines de cette Aquitaine ducale se perdent dans un flou relatif, car celui qui a longtemps été considéré comme son premier maître au VIIe siècle, le « duc » Félix, n’est mentionné que dans une unique source, le premier recueil des miracles de saint Martial de Limoges. Or, cette source est problématique et il est bien possible que Félix n’ait en fait jamais existé ; les origines du duché d’Aquitaine auraient alors été « oubliées » au sens premier du terme. Le présent article se propose d’interroger l’absence de mémoire des origines concernant le duché d’Aquitaine au VIIe siècle, mais aussi la construction historiographique opérée postérieurement afin de combler cette lacune documentaire.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.750
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0070.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it