A <i>lacZ</i> reporter with high activity in the human fungal pathogen <i>Candida albicans</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Reporter genes are useful tools to study gene transcription in various organisms. For example, the lacZ gene encoding β-galactosidase has been extensively used as a reporter in bacteria, budding yeast, fruit fly, mouse etc. However, use of this gene in the human fungal pathogen Candida albicans has been limited, probably due to low β-galactosidase activity. Here, we describe a reporter derived from the Vibrio cholerae lacZ gene in which codons have been optimized for expression in C. albicans. The constitutively active ACT1 promoter was fused to this synthetic lacZ reporter and integrated in the C. albicans genome. High β-galactosidase activity in liquid assays was observed for this reporter as well as coloration on X-gal plates. When the lacZ reporter expression was driven by the MET3 promoter, β-galactosidase activity in liquid assays and coloration on X-gal plates was higher in the absence of methionine, thus recapitulating the regulation of the native MET3 gene. This synthetic lacZ gene extends the toolbox of C. albicans reagents by providing a useful reporter for analysis of promoter activity in this organism of medical importance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".