MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3129776981 · doi:10.1109/icjece.2020.3018495

Effective Model Predictive Voltage Control for a Sensorless Doubly Fed Induction Generator

2021· article· en· W3129776981 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMultilevel Inverters and Converters
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsModel predictive controlControl theory (sociology)Doubly fed electric machineGenerator (circuit theory)VoltageInduction generatorControl (management)Computer scienceEngineeringPhysicsAC powerElectrical engineeringArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article presents a novel model predictive voltage control (MP VC) for a doubly fed induction generator (DFIG) without a speed sensor. The methodology of the considered MP VC is articulated on the direct voltage control by incorporating the deadbeat control principle within the model predictive topology. The derivation of the utilized cost function is accomplished in organized steps. The finite control set (FCS) principle is adopted to avoid the utilization of the pulsewidth modulation (PWM), which contributes to simplifying the system configuration. For estimating the rotor position, a robust estimator is proposed to achieve precise tracking of the rotor alignment, and thus, a perfect co-ordinates transformation can be achieved. To visualize the significance of the intended MP VC in regard to the classic model predictive techniques, accurate analysis of the DFIG dynamics under the proposed MP VC and model predictive direct torque control (MP DTC) is presented. The test results approve and reveal the predomination of the presented MP VC over the MP DTC. Furthermore, the effectiveness of the proposed sensorless scheme is verified for different ranges of speed operation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.867
Threshold uncertainty score0.574

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.168
Teacher spread0.162 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it