MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3129845283

ECONOMÃAS BASADAS EN EL CONOCIMIENTO: ALBERTA Y MÉXICO

2006· article· es· W3129845283 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Gabriela Correa LÃ pez

Bibliographic record

VenueDenarius · 2006
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicRegional Development and Innovation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Con la expansion global de las tecnologias de informacion y comunicaciones en las ultimas decadas del siglo XX, se ha dado paso a la construccion del concepto de economias y sociedades basadas en el conocimiento, para referirse a escenarios que involucran actividades relacionadas con la creacion y difusion en el uso de esas tecnologias. Las visiones de un siglo XXI, caracterizado por actividades asociadas a la llamada nueva economia, suponen dar paso a sociedades y economias donde la innovacion, las tecnologias y los recursos humanos formen un nuevo ambiente de negocios a nivel global, regional y local. La comparacion entre Mexico y Canada es ilustrativa de las grandes diferencias que respecto a la construccion de esas economias basadas en el conocimiento (Knowledge-based Economy, KBE), enfrentan los paises industrializados y los que se consideran mercados emergentes. Particularmente en Canada, la provincia de Alberta ha mantenido una deliberada politica de promocion de actividades de nuevas tecnologias con logros importantes, proyectando su intencion de convertirse en una KBE y erigiendose en un ejemplo de las posibilidades de este tipo de desarrollo.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.094
Threshold uncertainty score0.685

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.006
Science and technology studies0.0070.003
Scholarly communication0.0070.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDenariusSame topicRegional Development and InnovationFrench-language works237,207