MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W312987342

The End of Days: Fundamentalism and the Struggle for the Temple Mount

2001· article· en· W312987342 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Middle East Journal · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicJewish and Middle Eastern Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFaithArchbishopReligious studiesFundamentalismTheologyPoliticsLawEconomic JusticeSociologyHistoryPhilosophyPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The End of Days: Fundamentalism and Struggle for Temple Mount, by Gershom Gorenberg. New York, London, Toronto, Sydney, Singapore: The Free Press, 2001, 250 pages. Notes to 267. Index to 275. $25. A belief in End of Time has been a staple in Abrahamic tradition for over two millennia. Occasionally, it is associated with political militancy, but mostly it hovers on pietistic side of religion. Believers dream that God will someday sweep away evil and bring justice and a Day of Judgement. But for secular people, religious passion can seem irrational and perhaps dangerous. Even word fundamentalist, which originally meant an adherence to fundamentals of faith, is often a hostile word. Gershom Gorenberg has avoided these problems. He treats his subjects with respect, not as mental cases. He summarizes their views faithfully and differentiates between groups with similar vocabulary. Focusing mostly on Jewish and Christian perspectives, he has written a useful journalistic study of Jerusalem and End-of-Days theology. It is a briefing book filled with interviews, texts, and quotes. Gorenberg distinguishes between faith and threat. When televangelist John Hagee writes of Third Temple, it is not same as when an Israeli Prime Minister (Binyamin Netanyahu) gives an Archbishop a silver relief showing Dome of Rock replaced by that Temple (p. 239). Hagee has a television show. The Prime Minister of Israel has an army and a nuclear capability. Netanyahu was the true example of politician as sorcerer's apprentice. He spent his career calling up religious energies without understanding And if politicians must show caution, so must clergy. To suggest that Dome be blown up is clearly an incitement to violence. To say that giving up land is a capital offense is also an incitement, even if rabbis later deny that they had wanted Prime Minister killed. To quote an Israeli security official: a rabbi has something to say, let him say it, but he has to keep in mind that in eighteenth row there's that one student who's interpreting his (p. 242). If underestimating impact of words causes problems, so does overestimating them. In 1993 raid on Branch Davidian sect in Waco, Texas, Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) agents refused to listen to Bible babble. They treated rhetoric as danger and made disastrous decisions based upon a false reading of religious words. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.469
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0050.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.089
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it